IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE. CARL R. ROACH, PLAINTIFF, VS. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRAD W. ZABEL GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY 8, 2002 (20020108). Topics: tobacco, cigarette, deposition
JCCP NO. 4042. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. COORDINATION PROCEEDING SPECIAL TITLE (RULE 1550(B)) IN RE TOBACCO CASES II (INCLUDING ORIGINALLY COORDINATED ACTIONS AND ADD-ON CASES). THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: DEVIN DANIELS, ET AL., V. PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC., ET AL. (SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 719446). Topics: tobacco, cigarette, deposition
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. CIVIL ACTION NO. 99-CV-02496 (GK). UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. PLAINTIFF,. VS. PHILIP MORRIS, INCORPORATED, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS. Topics: tobacco, cigarette, deposition
COORDINATION PROCEEDING SPECIAL TITLE (RULE 1550 (B) IN RE: TOBACCO CASES II JCCP NO. 4042 TITLE DOCUMENT RELATES TO: DEVIN DANIELS, ET AL., V. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, ET AL., Topics: tobacco, cigarette, deposition
NORMA R. BROIN, ET AL. VS. PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC., ET AL. - TRIAL VOLUME 128 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS. DEPOSITIONS OF Expert Witnesses ERWIN BRADLEY, PH.D AND BERNARD SCOTT APPLETON, PH.D. Topics: tobacco, cigarettes, deposition
The witness, CEO and President of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, was deposed by the plaintiffs. He began by comparing the marketing position of RJR brands to Marlboro, which has been the top selling cigarette for the past eighteen years. He described the inadequacies of current scientific knowledge, claiming for example that mouse studies have failed to show causality between tobacco and cancer. He also claimed that epidemiological research has failed to show environmental tobacco smoke to be as a risk... Topics: tobacco, cigarette, deposition, litigation, advertising, industry response, youth
The witness, Chairman, CEO and President of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, was deposed by the plaintiffs. He stated that the company's best-selling brand in the U.S. is GPC. He acknowledged that smoking is clearly associated with all the diseases warned about on cigarette packages. He indicated, however, that it has not been scientifically proven that physical smoking or passive smoking causes diseases. His company is not researching whether smoking causes diseases, but it is funding... Topics: tobacco, cigarettes, deposition, advertising, health effects, public awareness, industry activity,...